QuincyBob Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:18:39

Target is in trouble. And while it’s easy to get lost in the company’s recent (poor) handling of American culture war narratives that cast it as too “woke” or too willing to cave to online fascists, the root of Target’s problems runs deep.
tripskan
Don’t get me wrong – the massive consumer boycotts from Black organizers have done damage. And there are probably folks on the far right who think even Target’s toned-down, overwhelmingly beige Pride merch this year was still too loud.
https://tripscan39.org
трипскан
But its stock is in the gutter and sales have been falling for two years because of good ol’ business fundamentals. It overstocked. It lost the pulse of its customers. It went up against Amazon Prime with… actually, does anyone know what Target’s Amazon Prime competitor is called?
The brand we petite bourgeoisie once playfully referred to as Tar-zhay has lost its spark. The company reported a decline in sales for a third-straight quarter, part of a broader trend of falling or flat sales for two years. Employees have lost confidence in the company’s direction. And 2025 has been a particularly rough financially, as Black shoppers organized a boycott over Target’s decision to cave to right-wing pressure on diverse hiring goals.
Shares were down 10% Wednesday.

It’s not to say the new guy, Michael Fiddelke, is unqualified. He’s been at Target since he started as an intern more than 20 years ago, after all. But Wall Street is clearly concerned that Target’s leadership is underestimating the severity of the need for a significant change— just as President Donald Trump’s tariffs on imported goods threaten the entire retail industry.

Appointing a company lifer “does not necessarily remedy the problems of entrenched groupthink and the inward-looking mindset that have plagued Target for years,” Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail, said in a note to clients Wednesday.

Missing the mark
In its 2010s heyday, Target became a go-to for consumers who liked a bargain but didn’t necessarily like bargain-hunting. The shelves felt well-curated. You’d go to Target because it had one thing you needed and 12 things you didn’t know you needed. It was stocked with Millennial cringe long before Gen Z gave us the term Millennial cringe.

Target’s sales held strong through the pandemic as remote workers set up home offices and stocked up on essentials. Months of lockdown also benefited the store as people began refreshing their spaces because they didn’t really have much else to do and they were staring at the same walls all the time.

DanielTwise Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:10:50

По моему мнению Вы допускаете ошибку. Предлагаю это обсудить. Пишите мне в PM, пообщаемся.
1. go to the licensed website pin up and click on the https://alive2directory.com/index.php?p=d key "register".

AlfredLinee Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:06:52

Hej wszystkim!

Często pojawia się pytanie, czy lato to idealny moment na wykonanie tatuażu. Z samej strony jesteśmy więcej wolnego czasu, wypoczynki i łatwiej wygospodarować dzień na konferencję. Z pozostałej — wysokie temperatury, słońce, kąpiele czy aktywność seksualna mogą utrudniać proces gojenia.

Tatuaż latem można dokonać, ale prosi on tak dużej ostrożności oraz dobrej pielęgnacji. Trzeba wspominać o paru istotnych rzeczach:

unikanie bezpośredniego słońca przez pierwsze tygodnie,

brak kąpieli w basenie, morzu czy jeziorze,

ochrona przed wysiłkiem i zabrudzeniem,

stosowanie odpowiednich kremów według zaleceń tatuatora,

po wygojeniu — regularne używanie filtrów SPF, najlepiej 50+.

Chciałbym poznać Wasze doświadczenia:

Czy robiliście kiedyś tatuaż latem? Jak wyglądało gojenie w porównaniu do własnych pór roku?

Jakie środki ostrożności stosowaliście?

Czy rzeczywiście lato istnieje dużo trudne, czy toż zaledwie mit?

Jakie dysponujecie bezpośrednie sprawdzone triki, żeby tatuaż nie stracił koloru oraz pięknie się wygoił?

Moim zdaniem zestaw do tatuażu wszystko zmniejsza się do winie i wiedz. Tatuaż w lecie nie jest zakazany, ale musi większej konkurencje.

Co o tym myślicie? Jakie tworzycie inne treści i konferencji dla kobiet chcących tatuaż dopiero teraz?

KennethThite Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:25:24

It’s no secret how President Donald Trump feels about sports teams turning away from Native American mascots. He’s repeatedly called for the return of the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, claiming their recent rebrands were part of a “woke” agenda designed to erase history.

But one surprising team has really gotten the president’s attention: the Massapequa Chiefs.

The Long Island school district has refused to change its logo and name under a mandate from New York state banning schools from using team mascots appropriating Indigenous culture. Schools were given two years to rebrand, but Massapequa is the lone holdout, having missed the June 30 deadline to debut a new logo.
kra40
The district lost an initial lawsuit it filed against the state but now has the federal government on its side. In May, Trump’s Department of Education intervened on the district’s behalf, claiming the state’s mascot ban is itself discriminatory.

Massapequa’s Chiefs logo — an American Indian wearing a yellow feathered headdress — is expected to still be prominently displayed when the fall sports season kicks off soon, putting the quiet Long Island hamlet at the center of a political firestorm.
kra32 сс
The district is now a key “battleground,” said Oliver Roberts, a Massapequa alum and the lawyer representing the school board in its fresh lawsuit against New York claiming that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory.

The Trump administration claims New York’s mascot ban violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal funds from engaging in discriminatory behavior based on race, color or national origin — teeing up a potentially precedent-setting fight.

The intervention on behalf of Massapequa follows a pattern for a White House that has aggressively applied civil rights protections to police “reverse discrimination” and coerced schools and universities into policy concessions by withholding federal funds.

“Our goal is to assist nationally,” Roberts said. “It’s us putting forward our time and effort to try and assist with this national movement and push back against the woke bureaucrats trying to cancel our country’s history and tradition.”
kra34 cc
https://kra-40at.ru

Philipicock Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:45:57

buy propecia pills propeciafx propeciafx where buy propecia

NancyFem Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:43:17

No bloated banners. No “new click" in order look at the https://bccp.baylorisr.org/exploring-online-betting-bet365-uk-a-comprehensive-2/.

Derickcow Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:42:21

зайти на сайт nova маркетплейс личный кабинет

Rickybef Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:35:31

It’s no secret how President Donald Trump feels about sports teams turning away from Native American mascots. He’s repeatedly called for the return of the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, claiming their recent rebrands were part of a “woke” agenda designed to erase history.

But one surprising team has really gotten the president’s attention: the Massapequa Chiefs.

The Long Island school district has refused to change its logo and name under a mandate from New York state banning schools from using team mascots appropriating Indigenous culture. Schools were given two years to rebrand, but Massapequa is the lone holdout, having missed the June 30 deadline to debut a new logo.
kra35
The district lost an initial lawsuit it filed against the state but now has the federal government on its side. In May, Trump’s Department of Education intervened on the district’s behalf, claiming the state’s mascot ban is itself discriminatory.

Massapequa’s Chiefs logo — an American Indian wearing a yellow feathered headdress — is expected to still be prominently displayed when the fall sports season kicks off soon, putting the quiet Long Island hamlet at the center of a political firestorm.
kraken39
The district is now a key “battleground,” said Oliver Roberts, a Massapequa alum and the lawyer representing the school board in its fresh lawsuit against New York claiming that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory.

The Trump administration claims New York’s mascot ban violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal funds from engaging in discriminatory behavior based on race, color or national origin — teeing up a potentially precedent-setting fight.

The intervention on behalf of Massapequa follows a pattern for a White House that has aggressively applied civil rights protections to police “reverse discrimination” and coerced schools and universities into policy concessions by withholding federal funds.

“Our goal is to assist nationally,” Roberts said. “It’s us putting forward our time and effort to try and assist with this national movement and push back against the woke bureaucrats trying to cancel our country’s history and tradition.”
kra32
https://kra-36cc.ru

ElmerTratt Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:18:49

It’s no secret how President Donald Trump feels about sports teams turning away from Native American mascots. He’s repeatedly called for the return of the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, claiming their recent rebrands were part of a “woke” agenda designed to erase history.

But one surprising team has really gotten the president’s attention: the Massapequa Chiefs.

The Long Island school district has refused to change its logo and name under a mandate from New York state banning schools from using team mascots appropriating Indigenous culture. Schools were given two years to rebrand, but Massapequa is the lone holdout, having missed the June 30 deadline to debut a new logo.
kra31 cc
The district lost an initial lawsuit it filed against the state but now has the federal government on its side. In May, Trump’s Department of Education intervened on the district’s behalf, claiming the state’s mascot ban is itself discriminatory.

Massapequa’s Chiefs logo — an American Indian wearing a yellow feathered headdress — is expected to still be prominently displayed when the fall sports season kicks off soon, putting the quiet Long Island hamlet at the center of a political firestorm.
kra32 at
The district is now a key “battleground,” said Oliver Roberts, a Massapequa alum and the lawyer representing the school board in its fresh lawsuit against New York claiming that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory.

The Trump administration claims New York’s mascot ban violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal funds from engaging in discriminatory behavior based on race, color or national origin — teeing up a potentially precedent-setting fight.

The intervention on behalf of Massapequa follows a pattern for a White House that has aggressively applied civil rights protections to police “reverse discrimination” and coerced schools and universities into policy concessions by withholding federal funds.

“Our goal is to assist nationally,” Roberts said. “It’s us putting forward our time and effort to try and assist with this national movement and push back against the woke bureaucrats trying to cancel our country’s history and tradition.”
kra31 at
https://kra---39--cc.ru

EdithGlody Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:40:53

Очень забавный вопрос
firma daleko dziala Przy hazardzie rynku od 1993 roku, https://compoundwealth.uk/lvbet-rejestracja-kompletny-przewodnik-dla-nowych/ co najlepiej ma wplyw na recenzje uzytkownikow o marce.